Quizlet: http://quizlet.com/58344887/flashcards
personality= the characteristic and enduring pattern of thinking, feeling, acting
- distinguishes us from other individuals and is relatively unchanging
psychodynamic perspective: Sigmund Freud
- treated patients who suffered from nervous disorders, symptoms could not be explained with physical/medical terms
comprehensive theory of personality: unconscious mind, psychosexual stages, defense mechanisms
- unconscious mind: vast reservoir of unacceptable thoughts, feelings, urges
- psychoanalytic theory: attributes thoughts and actions to unconscious motives and conflicts
- psychoanalysis= process to expose and relieve these inner tensions
- free association: talk about whatever, in order to tap unconscious
- the mind is like an iceberg: conscious mind is just a tiny part, majority of consciousness lies beneath the surface
- unconscious represses hidden thoughts and wishes
- Freudian slip= accidental slips of tongue motivated by unconscious desires
- dream analysis: "dreams are the royal road to the unconscious"
- manifest content: storyline that you can remember (censored version)
- latent content: subtle satisfaction of desires in dreams, suppressed from memory
- personality structure: personality develops through conflict between biological impulses (id) and social restraints (superego)
- id: unconscious strives to satisfy sex and aggressive drives
- operates on pleasure principle--demanding immediate gratification
- ego: executive--mediates demand of id and superego
- operates on reality principle--what makes sense
- superego: standards for judgement and internalized societal values, strives for perfection, resulting in pride or guilt
Freud was mostly wrong, but he was right in his theory of decision-making-- we often experience conflicts between pleasure and morality/what is socially acceptable.
Personality Development
Freud believed that personality was formed during childhood stages called psychosexual stages
- during these stages, the id focuses on pleasure-sensitive areas of the body called erogenous zones
- believed children were seeking sexual pleasure through these stages
- Oral (0-18 months) pleasure centers on mouth- sucking, biting, chewing
- Anal (18-36 months) pleasure focuses on bowel and bladder elimination
- Phallic (3-6 years) pleasure zone is in genitals; coping with incestous feelings
- Latency (6-puberty) dormant sexual feelings
- Genital (puberty+) maturation of sexual interests
- Oedipus complex: during the phallic stage, boy desires mother sexually and sees father as a rival
- castration anxiety= fear of punishment from the father
- Electra complex: girl sexually desires her father, becomes envious and wishes she had male sex organs= penis envy
- children cope with the sexual desire for their parents in a variety of ways:
- identification= identify with rival parent to form gender identity, incorporate parent’s values into their superegos
- fixation= unresolved conflicts in psychosexual stages resurface as bad behavior in adulthood
- oral fixation= overeating, smoking
- anal fixation= perfectionism, disorganization
- phallic fixation= arrogant, competitive, proud, afraid of intimacy
Defense Mechanisms= ego’s protective method of reducing anxiety by unconsciously distorting reality
- repression: gets rid of anxiety by pressing it deep down and trying to forget
- regression: leads anxious individual to return to a more basic psychosexual stage
- reaction formation: unconsciously switch unacceptable impulses to their opposites
- projection: people attribute their own impulses to others
- rationalization: self-justifying explanations hide the deeper problem
- displacement: shifts sexual or aggressive impulses to a safer outlet
- sublimation: modifies urges into something socially acceptable
Neo-Freudians
- Alder: children struggle with insecurity, have inferiority complex and desire power
- Horney: sense of helplessness triggers desire for love, women don't actually experience penis envy
- Jung: believed in collective unconscious
- not how genetics works, but how culture works
- evaluating personality from unconscious mind is difficult: requires projective tests
- thematic apperception tests (TAT)- subject given ambiguous image, asked to make up a story; their answer reveals aspects of unconscious
- Rorschach inkblot test: identifies inner feelings
- tests lack reliability (consistency) and validity (truthfulness)
- when evaluating same patient, different trained raters often produce completely different results
- often diagnose incorrectly
Modern psychodynamic psychology
- some of Freud’s theories were right: much of mental life is unconscious, where we struggle with interior, childhood shapes our personalities and relationships
- yet, many of Freud’s other ideas dismissed/discredited: id, ego, superego, oral anal and phallic stages
- theories don't rely on science
- theories explain everything but predict nothing
- hinges on repression of traumatic events
- in reality, traumatic experiences are in the front of our mind, we can not repress/forget them
- things that Freud was wrong about:
- personality develops throughout life and is not fixed in childhood
- underemphasized peer influences- may be as powerful as parents
- gender identity actually develops before 5-6 years of age
- there may be other reasons for dreams besides fulfillment of unconscious desires
- verbal slips can be explained on basis of cognitive processing
- “supressed sexuality=psychological disorders” yet sexual freedom has increased and psychological disorder rates are the same
- Freud misinterpreted stories of sexual abuse as the patient’s own repressed childhood wishes (sexual abuse was an unheard of, foreign concept in his time)
- not everyone is so psychologically disturbed-- all his theories were based off of case studies of the most psychologically disturbed people in Europe
His contributions:
- drew attention to unconscious mind- modern research shows existence of non-conscious processing
- defense mechanisms- our tendency to protect our self-esteem is real
- tension between biological impulses and social approval is common
(note: Freud did a LOT of cocaine--he thought it increased his brain power)
Humanistic Perspective
1960’s--Freud’s popularity is waning, new wave of psychology and the birth of behaviorism
Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers: didn’t focus on sick, disordered people
- examined happy, healthy people and tried to figure out what they were doing right
Self-Actualizing Person
- Maslow designed a hierarchy of needs: we must satisfy the lower, basic levels before we can satisfy the upper ones
- to create the hierarchy, he studied successful, creative people from history and modern times, compiled list of their qualities
- biased theory: he chose who looked happy
- self-actualization: fulfilling your potential as a human being, changing the world
- Traits of a Self-Actualized Person:
- self-aware, self-accepting
- open, spontaneous, loving and caring
- not paralyzed by other’s opinions
- focused energy on mission in life
- a few deep relationships
- moved by some spiritual or personal “peak moment” that surpassed ordinary conciousness
- Requirements for growth into a self-actualized person:
- genuineness- open with feelings, transparent
- acceptance- unconditional positive regard: acceptance of others, despite their failings or flaws
- empathy- sharing and mirroring feelings of others
- assessing self: asked people to write about real self and ideal self
- if two are close, person has a positive self-concept
Effects of the Humanistic Perspective
- pervasive impact on counseling, education, child-rearing
- having a positive self-concept as a key to happiness--now a widely accepted idea
- promotes western individualistic thought (self-indulgence)
- vague, subjective, lacks scientific basis
- turns blind eye to human capacity for evil
Exploring the Self
- research focuses on different possible selves: what we dream/dread
- spotlight effect: we overestimate how much people evaluate us
- self-reference effect in recall and memory: we believe everything applies/relates to us
- benefits of self-esteem (self-worth)= better sleep, persistence, happiness
- of course, correlation does not signify causation
- members of stigmatized or low-status groups maintain self-esteem:
- value things at which they excel
- attribute problems to prejudice
- compare themselves to others in their group
Self-Serving Bias= natural readiness to perceive ourselves favorably
- accept responsibility for good deeds/success, blame outside forces for failure
- most people see themselves as better than average
- self-serving bias is one of the most consistent findings in psychology
- less common in asia, where modesty is more highly valued
- normal, healthy part of human psychology--lack of self-serving bias can actually be a sign of depression
Types of Self-Esteem
- defensive self esteem: fragile, egotistic, focuses on sustaining self
- failure and criticism are threatening; aggressive, antisocial behavior
- secure self esteem: less fragile, less dependent on external factors
- focus on things beyond themselves- relationships+changing the world
Personality
trait perspective:
Gordon Allport- thought Freud was too deep in psyche and hidden motives
- emphasized describing personality instead of trying to explain it
- classify personality into “types”
- traits= individual’s unique pattern of behavior or disposition to behave
- Myers-Briggs type indicator= personality test
- factor analysis= statistical approach used to identify clusters of related items
- Cattel used this approach to develop a 16-personality factor inventory (16FP)
- ex: basic trait-excitement= superfieical traits- impatience, irritability
- Hans and Sybil Eysenck reduced personality to 2 dimensions: introversion v. extroversion and stability v. instability
Biology of Personality
- extraverts seek arousal because normal brain arousal is low
- PET scan shows less frontal lobe activity/signs of inhibition
- genes play a role in temperament/reactivity
Personality Inventory- questions designed to gauge feelings/behaviors
- Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)- originally used to identify disorders
- Empirically derived: test pool of items, select those that discriminated/distinguished between different groups
Big Five Factors: conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, openness, extraversion (CANOE)
- 50% of each trait is inherited
- common across cultures
- these traits can predict other attributes- conscientious= morning person, extraverted=night person
Evaluating the Trait Perspective
- person/situation controversy
- Walter Mischel- traits are enduring but behavior changes depending on the situation
- trait theorists argue that average behavior remains the same
- traits are socially significant
- ex: jazz, classical and blues= open and verbally intelligent
- pop, country, religious= cheerful, outgoing conscientious
- consistency of expressive style
- expressive styles of speaking and gestures demonstrate trait consistency
- inhibited people pretending to be expressive--not as expressive
Social-Cognitive Perspective
- Bandura: believes personality is the result of interaction between individual and social context
- reciprocal determinism= behavior, cognition, environment are interlocking determinants
- different people choose different environments
- our personalities shape our reactions
- our personalities create situations to which we react
- personal control: whether we control the environment or the environment controls us
- external locus of control: outside forces control our fate
- internal locus of control: we can control our own fate
- internals achieve more in school, act independently, better health, less depressed, delayed gratification, cope with stress, fewer marital problems
- learned helplessness: develops if exposed to uncontrollable bad events
- observe people interacting in simulations
- used to recruit police officers, teachers etc.
- critics argue that there is too much focus on the situation and not enough on the person
Optimism v. Pessimism
- realistic positive expectation fuels motivation and success
- overconfidence= complacency/blindness to real risks
- Positive psychology: Martin Seligman
No comments:
Post a Comment